Class 12 Chemistry Chapter 9: Coordination Compounds NCERT Solutions
CBSE Class 12 Chemistry Chapter 9: Coordination Compounds introduces students to the fascinating world of these compounds. This chapter delves into Werner's postulates, which are crucial for understanding the bonding within coordination compounds. You'll learn to differentiate between double salts and coordination compounds, with clear examples like Mohr's salt versus tetraamminecopper(II) sulfate. The solutions also define and illustrate essential terms such as coordination entity, ligands, coordination number, coordination polyhedron, homoleptic, and heteroleptic complexes. This resource aims to build a strong foundation by explaining these complex topics clearly, helping you tackle exercise problems with confidence and prepare thoroughly for your board exams. It bridges theoretical knowledge with practical understanding, making learning more effective.
Quick info
| Board | CBSE |
|---|---|
| Class | Class 12 |
| Subject | Chemiry |
| Session | 2026 |
| Language | English |
| Type | NCERT Solutions |
| Chapter | Chapter 9: Coordination Compounds - NCERT Exercises Solutions |
Chapter summary
Chapter 9 of the NCERT Class 12 Chemistry textbook focuses on Coordination Compounds. This section provides solutions to the exercises, clarifying Werner's postulates on bonding, the difference between double salts and coordination compounds, and defining essential terms like coordination entity, ligands, coordination number, and coordination polyhedron. It also explains homoleptic and heteroleptic complexes with examples, aiding students in grasping the structural and bonding aspects of these important chemical species.
Learning outcomes
- Understand Werner's postulates for bonding in coordination compounds.
- Differentiate between double salts and coordination compounds.
- Define and identify coordination entities, ligands, and central metal ions.
- Determine the coordination number and coordination polyhedron of a metal ion.
- Distinguish between homoleptic and heteroleptic coordination compounds.
- Explain the concepts with relevant examples.
Topics covered
Paper topics
- Werner's Postulates
- Primary and Secondary Valencies
- Coordination Compounds vs. Double Salts
- Coordination Entity
- Ligands
- Coordination Number
- Coordination Polyhedron
- Homoleptic Complexes
- Heteroleptic Complexes
- Oxidation State
- Mohr's Salt
- Tetraamminecopper(II) sulfate
Important topics
- Werner's Postulates
- Distinction between Double Salts and Coordination Compounds
- Definition and Examples of Ligands
- Coordination Number and Coordination Polyhedron
- Coordination Entity
PDF preview
Read page by page below. PDF is streamed from the official NCERT website — no download button on this page.
Questions and Solutions
Question 9.1
Alfred Werner's theory, proposed in 1893, was the first to explain the structure and bonding in coordination compounds. His key postulates are:
- Metal atoms exhibit two types of valencies: primary valency and secondary valency.
- Primary Valency: This is usually ionizable and corresponds to the oxidation state of the metal ion. It is satisfied by negative ions. For example, in , the primary valency of cobalt is +3, satisfied by three chloride ions.
- Secondary Valency: This is non-ionizable and corresponds to the coordination number of the metal ion. It is satisfied by both negative ions and neutral molecules (ligands). These ligands are directly attached to the central metal atom and project in specific directions in space, determining the geometry of the complex. In , the secondary valency of cobalt is 6, satisfied by six ammonia molecules.
- The secondary valencies are directed towards the corners of a specific geometric shape (like octahedron, tetrahedron, square planar) around the central metal atom.
- The number of primary valencies is equal to the oxidation state, and the number of secondary valencies is equal to the coordination number.
In modern terms, primary valency is the oxidation state, and secondary valency is the coordination number.
Question 9.2
A solution of mixed with in a 1:1 molar ratio gives the test for ion, but a solution of mixed with aqueous ammonia in a 1:4 molar ratio does not give the test for ion. Explain why?
The difference in the behavior of the two mixtures lies in the nature of the compounds formed. Both are addition compounds, but one is a double salt and the other is a coordination compound.
1. Mohr's Salt (Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate): When
FeSO_4 and (NH_4)_2SO_4
are mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio, they form a double salt, ferrous ammonium sulfate,
FeSO_4 \cdot (NH_4)_2SO_4 \cdot 6H_2O
. Double salts are ionic compounds that exist as discrete ions in the solid state and dissociate completely into their constituent ions when dissolved in water. In aqueous solution, Mohr's salt dissociates as:
FeSO_4 \cdot (NH_4)_2SO_4 \cdot 6H_2O(aq) \longrightarrow Fe^{2+}(aq) + 2NH_4^+(aq) + 2SO_4^{2-}(aq) + 6H_2O(l)
Since
Fe^{2+}
ions are present in the solution, it gives a positive test for
Fe^{2+} . 2. Tetraamminecopper(II) Sulfate: When
CuSO_4
is mixed with aqueous ammonia in a 1:4 molar ratio, it forms a coordination compound, tetraamminecopper(II) sulfate,
[Cu(NH_3)_4]SO_4 \cdot 5H_2O
. In this compound, the copper ion is coordinated to four ammonia molecules, forming a complex ion
[Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}
. This complex ion is stable and does not dissociate into
Cu^{2+} and NH_3
in solution. The compound dissociates only into the complex ion and the sulfate ion:
[Cu(NH_3)_4]SO_4 \cdot 5H_2O(aq) \longrightarrow [Cu(NH_3)_4]^{2+}(aq) + SO_4^{2-}(aq) + 5H_2O(l)
Since free
Cu^{2+}
ions are not present in the solution, it does not give the characteristic test for
Cu^{2+}
ions.
Question 9.3
Explain with two examples each of the following:
- Coordination entity
- Ligand
- Coordination number
- Coordination polyhedron
- Homoleptic and heteroleptic complexes
Here are explanations and examples for each term:
-
Coordination Entity:
A coordination entity consists of a central metal atom or ion bonded to a fixed number of ligands. It is often represented within square brackets and carries a net charge (positive, negative, or neutral).
Examples:
- Cationic complex:
- Anionic complex:
- Neutral complex:
-
Ligands:
Ligands are molecules or ions that possess at least one lone pair of electrons and can donate this pair to the central metal atom or ion to form a coordinate bond. They surround the central metal atom.
Examples:
- Neutral ligands: (ammonia), (aqua), (carbonyl)
- Anionic ligands: (chloro), (cyano), (hydroxo)
-
Coordination Number:
The coordination number of a central metal atom in a coordination entity is the number of ligand atoms directly attached to it. It represents the number of coordinate bonds formed by the ligands with the central metal atom.
Examples:
- In , the coordination number of Co is 6 (4 from NH3 and 2 from Cl).
- In , the coordination number of Ni is 4.
-
Coordination Polyhedron:
The coordination polyhedron refers to the geometrical arrangement of the ligands around the central metal atom in a coordination entity. This arrangement is determined by the coordination number and the nature of the ligands.
Examples:
- An octahedral coordination polyhedron (e.g., in ).
- A tetrahedral coordination polyhedron (e.g., in ).
-
Homoleptic and Heteroleptic Complexes:
- Homoleptic Complexes: These are coordination compounds in which the central metal atom is bonded to only one type of ligand. Examples: , .
- Heteroleptic Complexes: These are coordination compounds in which the central metal atom is bonded to more than one type of ligand. Examples: , .
Common mistakes
- Confusing primary and secondary valencies with oxidation state and coordination number.
- Difficulty in distinguishing between double salts and coordination compounds based on their behavior in solution.
- Incorrectly identifying ligands or the central metal atom in a coordination entity.
- Errors in determining the coordination number for complex structures.
Revision tips
- Review Werner's postulates thoroughly to understand the historical development of coordination chemistry.
- Focus on the key difference: double salts dissociate completely in solution, while coordination compounds form complex ions.
- Practice identifying ligands and their types (monodentate, bidentate, etc.) in various coordination entities.
- Memorize the definitions and examples of coordination entity, coordination number, and coordination polyhedron.
Practice MCQs
Q1. According to Werner's theory, primary valencies are satisfied by:
Explanation: Primary valencies in Werner's theory correspond to the oxidation state of the metal ion and are typically satisfied by negative ions.
Q2. Which of the following is a coordination compound?
Explanation: [Cu(NH3)4]SO4.5H2O is a coordination compound because the copper ion is coordinated with ammonia ligands and does not dissociate into free Cu2+ ions in solution.
Q3. The species [Ni(NH3)6]2+ is an example of:
Explanation: Since the overall charge on the species [Ni(NH3)6]2+ is positive (+2), it is classified as a cationic coordination entity.
Q4. In the coordination compound [Co(NH3)4Cl2]+, the ligands are:
Explanation: Ligands are the molecules or ions bonded to the central metal atom. In this case, ammonia (NH3) and chloride (Cl) are the ligands.
Q5. A coordination polyhedron is defined by the arrangement of:
Explanation: The coordination polyhedron describes the spatial arrangement of the ligands (secondary valencies) around the central metal atom.
Frequently asked questions
What are Werner's postulates regarding coordination compounds?
Werner's postulates state that metal atoms exhibit two types of valencies: primary (ionizable, corresponds to oxidation state) and secondary (non-ionizable, corresponds to coordination number). Secondary valencies are directed in space, defining the geometry of the complex.
How do double salts differ from coordination compounds?
Double salts, like Mohr's salt, dissociate into their constituent ions in solution, retaining individual ion properties. Coordination compounds, like [Cu(NH3)4]SO4, form complex ions in solution and do not dissociate into simple metal ions, thus losing their individual properties.
What is a ligand in a coordination compound?
A ligand is a molecule or an ion that is bonded to the central metal atom in a coordination entity. Ligands possess at least one lone pair of electrons to donate to the metal ion.
How is coordination number determined?
The coordination number is the number of ligand atoms directly bonded to the central metal atom. It is equivalent to the number of secondary valencies in Werner's theory.
What is the difference between homoleptic and heteroleptic complexes?
Homoleptic complexes contain only one type of ligand coordinated to the central metal atom (e.g., [Ni(NH3)6]2+). Heteroleptic complexes contain more than one type of ligand (e.g., [Co(NH3)4Cl2]+).
Why does FeSO4 solution mixed with (NH4)2SO4 give the test for Fe2+ ions?
FeSO4 and (NH4)2SO4 form a double salt (Mohr's salt) which dissociates completely in solution into Fe2+, NH4+, and SO4^2- ions. Therefore, the presence of free Fe2+ ions gives a positive test.
Content reviewed by the NCERT Help team. Editorial Team and update policy
NCERT Solutions PDF PDF on NCERT Help. URL unchanged for search indexing.